For Peacemaker.

Why did you move the two threads:

erasing Mecca's history and King Abdullah, was this smart - to intrafaith, neither of them really belongs there. Mecca's history is also part of the world history, tearing down building of holy significance and islamic architect/decorations, while it does belong to islam it also partly belongs to the world, much of it gave way to ideas to the rest of the world. Even in the article there is an english scholar speaking out against what is happening in Mecca.

And the King Abdullah thread, well when the Pope is in involved or anyone from another faith system or region of the world, that is kinda interfaith or current events or general or political, who know at the moment whether that sword giving is just politcal. It is common knowledge that leaders of the world generally give gifts.

Once again, you addressed me as "peacemarker." This is the third time you have done so. I expect you to at least address me properly; failing to do so may be termed as name-calling.

Hi Angela:

Once Angel posted her complaint, you should not have posted yours in this thread. Please see the following rule:

 Guidelines

Non-Muslims are encouraged to ask questions about Islam in Islam for non-Muslims section where discussion about Islam ( main stream Islam ) takes place; they can also take part in interfaith section where Muslims discuss Islam ( of course main stream Islam ) and other faiths with non-Muslims.

"And such threads, related to intra faith in some way, belong to intra faith only."

There are many threads that are like that, to me they are multifacet, are you going to put them all in intrafaith? 

Being in intrafaith means that you stay within the scope. But some involve other aspects, for e.g: like mecca's history and the sword gift involving outside facets, which needs to be in a neutral place, like interfaith or politic or current events. And because it involves non muslims as usually stated in articles, that should also be considered and involve non muslim participations. The two examples involve non muslims in the articles, that should say something. Also with the sword giving to the Pope, you render it unable for christians to be involved, they should also be able to participate afterall it involves their spiritual leader. I am sure you would object to this if it was the other way around?   

Moving threads without considering the posters involved is inconsiderate. I've talked about this before on and off. Obviously its going to still happen. Things need to be thought about before moving threads around. I did give my suggestions on what to do awhile back.

Peace

Brother Peacemaker,

In Angel's defense, of all things to be upset about [because it is obvious that it bothers you] why get upset over the mispelling of names? Angel has been here longer than me and has posted more longer than me and has been quite respectful of Islamic beliefs. I don't see where in the depths of your conscious could you conceive Angel's name- falibility as some sort of name calling or would even consider it? There are many variables to why we mispell consistently, I know I do. Maybe we are tired and want to post a comment before going to bed? What if, after finishing our post, miss our typos? Peacemarker is so mclose to Peacemaker that, I don't think a lot of people catch it, I know I didn't until you brought it up. As her friend I for one stand by her in the fact that she didn't deliberately do it.

We are all humans and make mistakes online and offline......