-------------------------------------------------- |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | |||
Muslim75
Senior Member Male Joined: 06 August 2014 Location: Senegal Status: Offline Points: 485 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
------------------------------------------ Edited by Muslim75 - 26 December 2014 at 11:53am |
|||
Caringheart
Senior Member Joined: 02 March 2012 Status: Offline Points: 2991 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Greetings muslim75, According to your definition, what would those conditions be? In what way were the Ottoman(islamic) wars of conquest justifiable? asalaam, CH note: I don't see where Matt Browne was 'insulting islam'... just stating his view of the Ottoman empire... a political power... just as all politcal powers can be critiqued... British empire and colonialism, Nazi regime, Communist(Stalin) regime, Spanish inquisitions, apartheid in S. Africa, etc., etc., etc. Peace and blessings to you. Edited by Caringheart - 02 October 2014 at 1:53pm |
|||
Let us seek Truth together
Blessed be God forever "I believe in Jesus as I believe in the sun... not because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else.: - C.S.Lewis |
|||
TG12345
Senior Member Male Joined: 16 December 2012 Status: Offline Points: 1146 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The "Magnificent" Ottoman Empire? Is this supposed to be some kind of a joke? How "magnificent" was the sacking of Constantinople? The murder of over a million Armenians? The ethnic cleansing and mass murder of Greeks? The conquests and occupation of the Balkans? Armenia? Greece? Do you know who the "janissaries" were? Children taken from their parents, put into the army and forced to fight and kill. Charles Taylor would have been impressed. Like their "Christian" counterparts who ruled European states, the "Muslim" Ottoman rulers were a bunch of imperialist aggressors, who conquered and occupied those around them. You call them "magnificent"? Shame on you. You are no different than the *****s who defend the Crusades. Edited by TG12345 - 02 October 2014 at 8:57pm |
|||
Matt Browne
Senior Member Male Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Yes, of course. Alexander the Great, the Romans and many others, although the term for their empires was different. In my post I was mainly referring to the British and French colonial empires that came when the Ottoman empire continued to decline.
Well, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and others might hold on to this silly dream of a neo-Ottoman empire. They were entitled to do so? Entitled by whom? No one is entitled to subjugate other peoples or nations. Anyone who claims otherwise is a dangerous radical who has learned nothing from the mistakes of the past.
Edited by Matt Browne - 04 October 2014 at 2:41am |
|||
A religion that's intolerant of other religions can't be the world's best religion --Abdel Samad
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people--Eleanor Roosevelt |
|||
Muslim75
Senior Member Male Joined: 06 August 2014 Location: Senegal Status: Offline Points: 485 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
------------------------------------------ Edited by Muslim75 - 26 December 2014 at 11:54am |
|||
TG12345
Senior Member Male Joined: 16 December 2012 Status: Offline Points: 1146 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
They were as "glorious" as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the State of Israel. |
|||
kodoo
Senior Member Joined: 05 February 2012 Status: Offline Points: 147 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I am from Turkey and I know the history of Ottomans more than any.
Though Ottoman Empire was a barrier to the western invasion (crusades) and I like it, and the nation was Islamic. Other than that, the leaders were hypocrite. They never worked to serve the nations. They always were after worldly gains. From its beginning. Look up how it was founded. There were many Dynasties after the Seljuks split up. And Ottoman Dynasty fought each and every one of these Muslim Dynasties to have their lands. Later, fighting Iranian Muslims. Later fighting Mamluk Muslims (Egypt) over and over. Look up Ottoman-Egypt wars. The emperors were always after power. They made Muslims fight against each other. They were this sickeningly attached to their thrones and worldly gains that, even they made it permissible to kill every innocent relative of theirs even in the cradle (so that there won't be a fight for throne). Look up how "Mehmed the Conqueror" killed his own baby brother. Look up how "Suleiman the Magnificent" killed 17 of his family members (children, nephews, grandkids in the cradle). etc. They had nothing to do with Islam. They were just a bunch of rulers after worldly gains. But Ottoman nation was great in general, though they were used against other Muslims (Persia, Egypt) sometimes. And sadly, the history is repeating itself. And now Turkish regime is after joining the EU, to serve NATO causes more and the government is using the nation to fight against Muslims in the region. So sad, how the progeny of that great nation -whcih stood up against western colonialism- is now used for NATO colonialism against Muslims of the region. Edited by kodoo - 15 October 2014 at 1:59am |
|||
kodoo
Senior Member Joined: 05 February 2012 Status: Offline Points: 147 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
P.s. Here's a great page to study Muslim history and today: http://www.crescent-online.net
ma salam Edited by kodoo - 15 October 2014 at 1:57am |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |