Media crusade |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Angel
Senior Member Joined: 03 July 2001 Status: Offline Points: 6641 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 12 July 2006 at 6:36am |
Media crusade Beirut Rarely have Western news organisations wooed Arab hearts and minds so avidly - or with so little certainty of political or commercial reward. Freed by satellite television and the internet from the dreary monopoly of state media, Arabs already get news in their own language from a plethora of local and foreign sources. Western media outfits, most with public funding and partly political motives, are racing to add more Arabic TV channels and web sites to the mix, undeterred by scant advertising revenue. Jihad Ballout, spokesman for the Dubai-based Al Arabiya television, said competition was welcome, giving more choice to consumers, but argued that from a business perspective the TV market was saturated. "The pie is quite limited," he said. Ballout, whose own channel was set up with Saudi financing, questioned why foreign media groups were planning big investments that were likely to take years to see a return. "Is it purely to reflect a different perspective, and whose perspective will it be?" he asked. The BBC plans to launch an Arabic TV channel in the northern autumn. Germany's Deutsche Welle has aired three hours daily of Arabic news and features since 2002. France's planned CNN-style channel expects to start an Arabic component next year. Even the Danish Broadcasting Corporation says it is contemplating news in Arabic. Russia Today, a state-run English-language television channel, has announced plans for an Arabic version. "It will definitely not be political," asserted Akram Khuzam, the venture's general producer, before adding: "Television is influence. Why should Russia ignore this instrument, especially in such a restive region?" A powerful tool it may be, but the challenge for any foreign news organisation will be to gain credibility in an area where distrust for Western policies is deep-rooted and flourishing - and where the airwaves are already brimming with alternatives. "There's a real cacophony of media in the region. Even poor neighbourhoods in Damascus have satellite dishes," said Ali Abunimah, who runs Electronic Intifada (electronicintifada.net) to promote Palestinian views on the Middle East conflict. "Even in a country as restricted as Syria, there is enormous access to media from elsewhere," said the 34-year-old Jordanian based in Chicago. "That challenges the US stereotype of a controlled media where people don't know any better." Polls show the channel of choice in most Arab homes is still the Qatar-based Al Jazeera, which blazed to success after it went on air in 1996 with its combination of hard news, slick format and talk shows that broke taboos in the Arab world. While its Arab perspective delighted an audience sometimes irritated - or simply not reached - by CNN or BBC World, Al Jazeera offended Arab governments by giving dissidents a platform and hosting often raucous political debates. Saudi Arabia hit back with Al Arabiya. Now Arab governments from Abu Dhabi to Mauritania have their own satellite stations, as do some Lebanese factions such as Hizbollah. Al Jazeera, which plans to launch its own English channel this year, also upset Washington by airing statements from al-Qaeda's Osama bin Laden after the September 11 attacks. As Arab anger mounted over the Iraq war and US support for Israel, the Americans launched Al Hurra (the Free One) Arabic TV station in 2004 to cut through what George Bush called "the barriers of hateful propaganda" in the Middle East. A poll published by the University of Maryland last year showed Al Hurra was the least watched of eight Arabic networks. Hizbollah's al-Manar channel did little better. Al Jazeera led with 65 per cent of viewers, trailed by Al Arabiya on 34 per cent. The survey, conducted in October with pollsters Zogby International, did its research in Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates. Can new Western entrants add value for Arab viewers? Lawrence Pintak, director of the American University in Cairo's Adhem Centre for Electronic Journalism, said BBC Arabic TV might be best-placed to win over an Arab public sceptical of Western "public diplomacy" and jaded by media overload. "The BBC brings a lot of credibility," he said, citing the track record of the BBC's Arabic radio service, for decades a listening habit for Arabs seeking independent news. Competitors suggest that the BBC's Arabic venture, directly funded by the Foreign Office, may be tarnished by the British government's decision to join the US-led invasion of Iraq. Johannes Hoffmann, spokesman for Deutsche Welle, said Arab viewers perceived the German station, unlike the US or British media, as independent and objective. "After all, we were not one of the warring parties (in Iraq)," he said. Abunimah said anything that smacked of propaganda would fall flat among Arabs tired of being treated as if they were stupid. "We don't need more documentaries about Denmark without addressing the political divides (between Arabs and the West)." Foreign media eyeing the Arab world should complement their coverage with "an honest acknowledgement of what is at the root of the divisions - anger at the policy choices of Western governments and intolerance in Western societies," he said. REUTERS http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/07/11/1152383734351.h tml |
|
~ Our feet are earthbound, but our hearts and our minds have wings ~
|
|
superme
Senior Member Joined: 03 April 2006 Location: Cocos (Keeling) Islands Status: Offline Points: 463 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Since 1999 I read news from other news network which I find it as more genuine news network than control network. Although the west claim that their news are free from government influence (controll) as well as individuals or organization but I don't see it that way. I read the saudi, iran, pakistan, indonesian and bbc news network. I used to read the american newsnetwork as well but I gave them up. Now I am still looking for more sources. Once you get used to read them together at the same time for some times - you will notice that western side of the news are not genuine anymore. But the people in the street still walk with pride with their chest walk ahead: "Ours is free". It takes time to see it alright. Or put it this way, as a muslim who is on the neutral side I find it the western side claims is not really that worthy. Sure there have variety of everything but - when they are called they obeyed. In the simplest term it is always money, not the truth. Hey do you know that in 1920's or 1930's there was a newspaper called "The Truth"?. What that tells you. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |