American Christian new member: my views |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
ProudSlave
Starter. Male Joined: 01 February 2015 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Caring Heart -
You mentioned "Democracy"; "Freedom"; and "America" (U.S. I assume, not South or Central). You do realize that the United States is NOT A Democracy, right? It is a Constitutional Republic. A Democracy does NOT result in freedom, it results in mob rule. As soon as any particular group holds a majority, their will can be legally imposed on the minority. This is why the Constitution of our Republic contains what are referred as "negative rights" (a list of things that can NOT be done to the citizenry by the government, even if the majority thinks it is ok) Just wanted to clear that up :-) |
|
Emettman
Senior Member Male Joined: 02 December 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 144 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Pretty much right: an unfettered democracy is mob rule with extra paperwork. The quality of a democracy (or a constitutional republic with (some) democratic voting process) depends on the degree to which the electorate id educated and informed. It also operates with the legal fiction that for this purpose all opinions are equally valid. Which they are not, really. "Democracy" is not a miracle word of liberty or perfection. Having said that, compared to most if not all the other options going around, it's hardly worse. For one thing it offers a route to changing authority and government without violence and bloodshed. The compatibility between Islam and democratic processes is low to minimal, as it is anathema that the public should have a deciding vote for something which might be unIslamic. |
|
airmano
Senior Member Joined: 31 March 2014 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I'd pretty much agree on what you (Emettman) wrote on democracy, i.e. the sentence
Democracy makes sure that those that are in power know that their successors may/will ask them to account for what they did (not) do and that there will be a (unforeseeable) successor in the first place. Here is a rather detailed study on the subject Happiness & Democracy (Do a "find" on "democracy" in this article) I see it pretty much as Winston Churchill did: Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time. Airmano Edited by airmano - 24 February 2015 at 8:26am |
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |